Cellular coenzyme · 7 min read

NAD+: Research Guide

A molecule every cell needs for energy and repair. Popular as an IV drip, though most human studies test oral NAD+ boosters.

Evidence
Early clinical
References
32 PubMed sources
Last reviewed
Status
Information only
Human evidence
CMany trials of oral NAD+ boosters with mixed results; NAD+ drips and injections themselves are barely studied.Small or early human studies, or trials of a closely related form (e.g. oral boosters, skin creams).
FDA status
Not approved · compounding under review

Not an FDA-approved drug. Listed as under evaluation for compounding; FDA proposed in 2019 not to allow it, with no final decision.

Sport (WADA)
Conditional

NAD+ itself is not banned, but IV drips or injections over 100 mL in 12 hours are prohibited.

My experience
No personal experience yet

How well it has worked for me, from 1 to 10. One person's experience, not evidence, and not a recommendation or dosing advice.Read my experience →

Sources for these ratings are cited in the guide below, mainly in Legal status.

At a glance

Structure
Two nucleotides joined by phosphate groups, one carrying adenine and the other nicotinamide (a form of vitamin B3). Not a peptide.
Molecular weight
≈663 Da
Formula
C21H27N7O14P2
Class
Coenzyme (dinucleotide)
Also known as
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide · Nadide · Coenzyme I · β-NAD

What is NAD+?

NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a helper molecule found in every living cell. Your cells use it to turn food into energy, and many enzymes that repair DNA and control genes can’t work without it [1].

Your body builds NAD+ from scratch out of tryptophan, an amino acid found in food, and recycles it from several forms of vitamin B3 [2]. Two of those vitamin B3 forms, nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), are sold as supplements to boost NAD+ levels [3].

Strictly speaking, NAD+ isn’t a peptide. It’s a coenzyme, built from two linked nucleotides rather than amino acids. We’ve included it because NAD+ drips have become popular in wellness clinics [4, 5].

How might it work?

  • Powering your cells. NAD+ carries electrons from one chemical reaction to the next. That shuttle service sits at the heart of how cells make energy [1].
  • Fueling repair enzymes. NAD+ is also consumed by enzymes that repair damaged DNA (PARPs) and by sirtuins, enzymes that help regulate genes [1]. Sirtuins are thought to help explain some of the health benefits of calorie restriction [6].
  • Why levels might fall. In mice, an enzyme called CD38, which breaks NAD+ down, becomes more active with age and drives NAD+ levels down [7]. In human skin, especially in men, DNA-repair enzymes grow busier with age as NAD+ falls, suggesting that repairing more damage may use up more NAD+ [8].
  • The “top up” idea. In old mice, raising NAD+ levels restored the cells’ energy factories (mitochondria) to a youthful state [9]. That finding helped spark today’s interest in NAD+ boosting.

What has research found?

Does NAD+ really fall with age?

  • Several studies say yes. NAD+ levels were lower with age in human skin [8], in the brain as measured by scans [10], and in blood plasma [11].
  • Activity seems to matter. NAD+ in muscle was lower in older adults, especially those with physical limitations. Older adults who exercised regularly had levels closer to those of young people, and NAD+ tracked with how many steps people took each day [12].
  • Exercise can rebuild the machinery. Twelve weeks of aerobic or strength training raised the main enzyme muscles use to recycle NAD+ by 12% to 30%, reversing its decline with age [13].
  • But not every study agrees. A 2026 analysis of seven groups of people found that NAD+ in whole blood stayed steady with age [14]. A 2025 review noted that an age-related decline has been seen consistently in only a limited number of human studies [15].

In animals

  • Healthier aging: Mice given NMN by mouth for a year gained less weight with age, were more active, had better insulin sensitivity and blood fats, and kept better eye function, with no obvious toxicity [16].
  • Stem cells and lifespan: NR rejuvenated muscle stem cells in old mice and extended their lifespan [17].
  • A surprising twist: Mice whose muscles had 85% less NAD+ than normal still had healthy muscles, normal strength and exercise capacity, and no sign of faster muscle aging [18]. That suggests low NAD+ may not be what drives muscle aging.

In people: NAD+ drips and injections

  • What happens to infused NAD+? In the first study to track an IV drip of NAD+ in people, blood NAD+ levels didn’t rise at all for the first two hours. The body cleared it as fast as it arrived and broke it down into smaller pieces [19].
  • Heart failure: In a trial of 180 people with heart failure in China, adding a small daily dose of IV NAD+ (10 mg a day for 7 days) to standard treatment led to stronger heart pumping at one month (an ejection fraction of about 45%, compared with 42% on placebo). There were hints of fewer hospital stays, but those weren’t statistically certain [20].
  • Addiction recovery: In an uncontrolled report of 50 people with substance use disorder, infusions combining NAD+ with other ingredients were followed by lower cravings, anxiety, and depression. There was no comparison group, and the lead author holds patents on part of the treatment [21].
  • Anti-aging and wellness: A 2026 systematic review found no trials that measured health outcomes from IV or intramuscular NAD+ for anti-aging or wellness [22].

In people: oral NAD+ boosters (NR and NMN)

  • They reliably raise NAD+. In one trial, NR raised blood NAD+ by 22%, 51%, and 142% at increasing doses within two weeks [23]. At higher doses, blood NAD+ rose up to fivefold [24].
  • Promising results:
    • NMN improved how well muscles respond to insulin in postmenopausal women with prediabetes [25].
    • In 90 people with poor leg circulation (peripheral artery disease), six months of NR improved the distance walked in six minutes: up 7 meters, compared with down 10.6 meters on placebo [26].
    • In people with COPD, six weeks of NR cut a marker of airway inflammation by about half, and the effect lasted 12 weeks after treatment stopped [27].
    • In people newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, NR raised NAD+ in the brain. Those whose brain levels rose showed changes in brain metabolism and mild improvement in symptoms [28].
  • Results that fell flat:
    • In obese men, 12 weeks of NR didn’t improve insulin sensitivity or body composition [29].
    • A 2025 meta-analysis found no evidence that NR or NMN preserves muscle mass or function in adults over 60 [30].
    • A 2026 meta-analysis of 15 NMN trials found no clear effect on weight, blood sugar, or cholesterol [31].

How strong is the evidence?

What we know so farWhat we still don’t know
NAD+ is essential to energy and repair in every cell [1]Whether NAD+ drips or injections slow aging or improve wellness, because no trials have measured it [22]
Oral NR and NMN reliably raise NAD+ levels [22, 23]What happens to infused NAD+ in the body, because only small studies have tracked it [4, 19]
Boosting NAD+ helps aging mice in many ways [16, 17]Whether NAD+ truly declines with age in people, because studies disagree [14, 15]
A few human trials show promise in specific conditions [25, 26, 27]Long-term safety, including the effect on existing cancers [2, 3]

A few more things to keep in mind:

  • Raising NAD+ is easy; proving benefits is harder. Oral boosters reliably raise NAD+, but their effects on health outcomes have been mixed and often null [22].
  • Mice aren’t people. Results from rodents don’t translate straightforwardly to humans [15].
  • Industry ties are common. Several trials were funded or co-authored by companies that sell NAD+ products or infusions [5, 23, 27].

Safety: what we know

  • Oral boosters seem well tolerated in the short term. NR at 3,000 mg a day for four weeks caused no moderate or severe side effects in people with Parkinson’s disease [24]. In NMN trials lasting up to 24 weeks, side effects were no more common than with placebo [31].
  • Drips can be uncomfortable. At a wellness clinic, people receiving 500 mg NAD+ drips reported moderate to severe stomach symptoms, a faster heart rate, and chest pressure. The symptoms made the drips take longer, about 97 minutes on average versus 37 minutes for NR drips, and they went away once the drips ended [5]. Nausea, cramping, and flushing have also been reported [4].
  • No long-term data. Long-term safety data for IV NAD+ are lacking [4].
  • The cancer question. NAD+ boosters might help cancer cells as well as healthy ones. In a mouse model of an aggressive breast cancer, NR made the cancer more common and more likely to spread to the brain [32]. In other mouse studies, NMN helped pancreatic tumors grow and resist chemotherapy [3]. Researchers urge caution for people with active cancer [3].
  • Not an approved medicine. NAD+ isn’t an FDA-approved drug [S1, S2].
  • United States: FDA lists NAD+ as “under evaluation” for compounding, and it doesn’t intend to act against pharmacies that compound with substances in that group, as long as certain conditions are met [S1, S2]. FDA proposed in 2019 not to add NAD+ to its approved list of compounding ingredients, but it hasn’t made a final decision [S2, S3].
  • Supplements: NR and NMN are sold as dietary supplements [23, 31].
  • Sports: NAD+ itself isn’t named on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s 2026 banned list. However, IV drips or injections totaling more than 100 mL in 12 hours are banned at all times, except during hospital treatment, surgery, or medical tests. That means an NAD+ drip can break the rules even though NAD+ itself doesn’t [S4].

The bottom line

NAD+ sits at the center of how our cells make energy and repair themselves, and boosting it has produced striking results in aging mice. Oral boosters reliably raise NAD+ in people, and early trials have shown encouraging signals in heart failure, poor circulation, lung disease, and Parkinson’s disease.

Still, the big promises haven’t been proven. It isn’t even settled whether NAD+ falls with age in people, and the popular IV drips have barely been studied. Larger, longer trials, especially of drips and injections, are the next step toward finding out how much NAD+ boosting can really do for human health.

References

Peer-reviewed sources indexed in PubMed, numbered in order of first citation. Study type is shown so you can judge how directly each source applies to humans.

  1. 1

    Covarrubias AJ, Perrone R, Grozio A, et al. (2021). NAD(+) metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 22(2):119-141.

  2. 2

    Braidy N, Liu Y (2020). NAD+ therapy in age-related degenerative disorders: A benefit/risk analysis. Exp Gerontol, 132:110831.

  3. 3

    Nakazzi F, Zarei M, Lopes M, et al. (2026). Vitamin B3 derivatives support pancreatic cancer cell survival and chemotherapy resistance. Cancer Lett, 645:218334.

  4. 4

    Alangari A, Arif J, Al Qureshah F, et al. (2026). Narrative review of intravenous NAD(+) and NAD(+) precursors in wellness and translational medicine. Front Aging, 7:1887175.

  5. 5

    Reyna K, Heinzen G, Patel N, et al. (2026). Intravenous infusion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) versus nicotinamide riboside (NR): a retrospective tolerability pilot study in a real-world setting. Front Aging, 7:1652582.

  6. 6

    Martens CR, Denman BA, Mazzo MR, et al. (2018). Chronic nicotinamide riboside supplementation is well-tolerated and elevates NAD(+) in healthy middle-aged and older adults. Nat Commun, 9(1):1286.

  7. 7

    Camacho-Pereira J, Tarragó MG, Chini CCS, et al. (2016). CD38 Dictates Age-Related NAD Decline and Mitochondrial Dysfunction through an SIRT3-Dependent Mechanism. Cell Metab, 23(6):1127-1139.

  8. 8

    Massudi H, Grant R, Braidy N, et al. (2012). Age-associated changes in oxidative stress and NAD+ metabolism in human tissue. PLoS One, 7(7):e42357.

  9. 9

    Gomes AP, Price NL, Ling AJ, et al. (2013). Declining NAD(+) induces a pseudohypoxic state disrupting nuclear-mitochondrial communication during aging. Cell, 155(7):1624-38.

  10. 10

    Zhu XH, Lu M, Lee BY, et al. (2015). In vivo NAD assay reveals the intracellular NAD contents and redox state in healthy human brain and their age dependences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112(9):2876-81.

  11. 11

    Clement J, Wong M, Poljak A, et al. (2019). The Plasma NAD(+) Metabolome Is Dysregulated in "Normal" Aging. Rejuvenation Res, 22(2):121-130.

  12. 12

    Janssens GE, Grevendonk L, Perez RZ, et al. (2022). Healthy aging and muscle function are positively associated with NAD(+) abundance in humans. Nat Aging, 2(3):254-263.

  13. 13

    de Guia RM, Agerholm M, Nielsen TS, et al. (2019). Aerobic and resistance exercise training reverses age-dependent decline in NAD(+) salvage capacity in human skeletal muscle. Physiol Rep, 7(12):e14139.

  14. 14

    Trętowicz MM, Scantlebery AML, Schomakers BV, et al. (2026). Human whole-blood NAD(+) levels do not vary with age or lifestyle interventions. Nat Metab, 8(6):1282-1290.

  15. 15

    Vinten KT, Trętowicz MM, Coskun E, et al. (2025). NAD(+) precursor supplementation in human ageing: clinical evidence and challenges. Nat Metab, 7(10):1974-1990.

  16. 16

    Mills KF, Yoshida S, Stein LR, et al. (2016). Long-Term Administration of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Mitigates Age-Associated Physiological Decline in Mice. Cell Metab, 24(6):795-806.

  17. 17

    Zhang H, Ryu D, Wu Y, et al. (2016). NAD⁺ repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice. Science, 352(6292):1436-43.

  18. 18

    Chubanava S, Karavaeva I, Ehrlich AM, et al. (2025). NAD depletion in skeletal muscle does not compromise muscle function or accelerate aging. Cell Metab, 37(7):1460-1481.e17.

  19. 19

    Grant R, Berg J, Mestayer R, et al. (2019). A Pilot Study Investigating Changes in the Human Plasma and Urine NAD+ Metabolome During a 6 Hour Intravenous Infusion of NAD. Front Aging Neurosci, 11:257.

  20. 20

    Yu X, Xu J, Cao J, et al. (2026). Effect of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 26(1):97-106.

  21. 21

    Blum K, Han D, Baron D, et al. (2022). Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+) and Enkephalinase Inhibition (IV1114589NAD) Infusions Significantly Attenuate Psychiatric Burden Sequalae in Substance Use Disorder (SUD) in Fifty Cases. Curr Psychiatry Res Rev, 18(2):125-143.

  22. 22

    Gallagher C, Emmanuel OO (2026). NAD⁺ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. Ageing Res Rev, 116:103057.

  23. 23

    Conze D, Brenner C, Kruger CL (2019). Safety and Metabolism of Long-term Administration of NIAGEN (Nicotinamide Riboside Chloride) in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Healthy Overweight Adults. Sci Rep, 9(1):9772.

  24. 24

    Berven H, Kverneng S, Sheard E, et al. (2023). NR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind safety trial of high dose nicotinamide riboside in Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun, 14(1):7793.

  25. 25

    Yoshino M, Yoshino J, Kayser BD, et al. (2021). Nicotinamide mononucleotide increases muscle insulin sensitivity in prediabetic women. Science, 372(6547):1224-1229.

  26. 26

    McDermott MM, Martens CR, Domanchuk KJ, et al. (2024). Nicotinamide riboside for peripheral artery disease: the NICE randomized clinical trial. Nat Commun, 15(1):5046.

  27. 27

    Norheim KL, Ben Ezra M, Heckenbach I, et al. (2024). Effect of nicotinamide riboside on airway inflammation in COPD: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nat Aging, 4(12):1772-1781.

  28. 28

    Brakedal B, Dölle C, Riemer F, et al. (2022). The NADPARK study: A randomized phase I trial of nicotinamide riboside supplementation in Parkinson's disease. Cell Metab, 34(3):396-407.e6.

  29. 29

    Dollerup OL, Christensen B, Svart M, et al. (2018). A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of nicotinamide riboside in obese men: safety, insulin-sensitivity, and lipid-mobilizing effects. Am J Clin Nutr, 108(2):343-353.

  30. 30

    Prokopidis K, Moriarty F, Bahat G, et al. (2025). The Effect of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide and Riboside on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 16(3):e13799.

  31. 31

    Yang W, Huang J, Tang Z, et al. (2026). Safety and Metabolism-Related Outcomes of Oral Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Supplementation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 18(14).

  32. 32

    Maric T, Bazhin A, Khodakivskyi P, et al. (2023). A bioluminescent-based probe for in vivo non-invasive monitoring of nicotinamide riboside uptake reveals a link between metastasis and NAD(+) metabolism. Biosens Bioelectron, 220:114826.

Regulatory & other sources

  1. S1

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503A of the FD&C Act. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.

  2. S2

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (Category 1: under evaluation; updated May 14, 2026). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.

  3. S3

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Amendments to the List of Bulk Drug Substances That Can Be Used To Compound Drug Products (Docket FDA-2018-N-4845): Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis, 2019. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.

  4. S4

    World Anti-Doping Agency (copy hosted by the International Testing Agency). World Anti-Doping Code International Standard: Prohibited List 2026 (M2.2, intravenous infusions and injections). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.